Digital Camera Or Galaxy S8 Camera Trip Pictures?
Milky way s8 vs a DSLR photographic camera
HParker • New Fellow member • Posts: 7
Galaxy s8 vs a DSLR photographic camera
Hi everyone! I am going to be starting a YouTube aqueduct here in the next couple of months over tech products under $100. I am nigh to purchase a galaxy s8 considering I have to accept Samsung's newest phone haha. Anyway would that be a good enough camera for my videos? The specs on it are pretty damn good for it beingness on a telephone. Or, should I only man up and go a DSLR camera like the Nikon 3300. I want my videos to expect as good every bit possible. Cheers anybody.
Re: Galaxy s8 vs a DSLR camera
2
If yous have a lot of extra lighting in your studio, you should exist ok: DSLRs practice really well in dim lighting. The but matter I'd worry about is that the smartphone has a rather wide angle of view, and then might give a lot of perspective distortion for shut-ups.
Nikon D200 Nikon D7000 Nikon D750 Nikon AF-Due south DX Nikkor 35mm F1.8G Nikon AF Nikkor 28mm f/2.8D +iv more than
Chen One thousand • Regular Member • Posts: 370
Re: Galaxy s8 vs a DSLR camera
ane
HParker wrote:
Hello everyone! I am going to be starting a YouTube channel here in the next couple of months over tech products under $100. I am about to purchase a galaxy s8 because I have to take Samsung'due south newest phone haha. Anyhow would that be a proficient enough camera for my videos? The specs on it are pretty damn good for information technology being on a phone. Or, should I just man up and get a DSLR camera like the Nikon 3300. I want my videos to expect equally good as possible. Thank you everyone.
"is x skilful plenty" is never a valid question because nobody knows what is good enough for you lot. But you lot do.
specs don't decide the quality of flagship cellphone cameras.
If y'all want your videos to await as good every bit possible then you take to spend as much money as you have, which I assume does not finish at an S8.
Re: Milky way s8 vs a DSLR camera
HParker wrote:
Howdy everyone! I am going to be starting a YouTube channel here in the next couple of months over tech products under $100. I am virtually to purchase a galaxy s8 because I take to have Samsung's newest telephone haha. Anyway would that be a expert plenty camera for my videos? The specs on it are pretty damn good for it being on a phone.
This is a Galaxy5 pic taken past a friend when I was forbidden to become on the roof (hip replacement).
Obviously this was used for error finding, not for marketing. But it did the job I needed from it.
Henry
Olympus SP-570 UZ Olympus SH-l Olympus Stylus SH-ane Olympus OM-D E-M10 Two Olympus OM-D Eastward-M10 Four +1 more
kierenlon • Senior Member • Posts: 1,009
Re: Galaxy s8 vs a DSLR photographic camera
The phone will be more than than capable for video. I would recommend buying a microphone to become with as the sound makes a huge difference.
Shoot about a window in daylight and you should be skillful to get. Once you have edited a few videos, you may want other features a camera or more expensive mic, lighting ready upwardly tin can provide but do that on review, not before yous start. There are lots of tech items happy to empty your wallet
Fujifilm 10-T30 Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R Fujifilm 15-45mm F3.5-v.6 OIS PZ Samsung Galaxy S9+ +2 more
Marty4650 • Forum Pro • Posts: 16,168
Of grade it is skillful enough
iii
In fact, it might even be overkill.
An alarming percentage of YouTube videos were taken with smartphones. And some of those smart telephone videos have racked upwardly hundreds of millions of hits, so the video quality wasn't an obstacle for those posting them. Or for those who viewed them.
Also recollect, if your videos are for "electronics under $100" in that location won't exist many visitors expecting your videos to be shot with thousand dollar cameras and lenses.
Panasonic LX100 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 +16 more
Re: Of course it is good enough
Your Milky way S8 volition probably exist expert enough with good lightning. You can hands ready a bunch of incandescent bare bulbs around your room to provide a cheap but bright and even lighting. The 1 thing I'd worry about is the closest focusing altitude of the S8, to show products from close-up. Brand sure to film in 4K, so that you lot tin can crop the video while editing and still have at to the lowest degree 1080p resolution. You lot can probably purchase lenses for the S8/S7's camera, too. That, with lighting, might be a good investment to give yourself flexibility. For the lighting, buy a couple of light bulb sockets and light bulbs. You can place them behind white sheets to make the lighting softer and more evenly distributed. Don't place the sheets as well close to the bulbs, non merely for the sheets not to catch burn down, merely for the bulbs to illuminate the sheets evenly, so that the area of the sheets illuminating y'all is big and even, to avoid harsh shadows.
With good light and manual control of your video recording, the difference between your phone and a expert photographic camera will be very difficult to see.
Sony a7R Iii Sigma 35mm F1.four DG HSM Fine art Sony FE 35mm F2.8 Sony Atomic number 26 55mm F1.eight Sigma 150-600mm F5-half dozen.3 | C +15 more than
Where are you going to go an $viii for under $100 ?
HParker wrote:
How-do-you-do everyone! I am going to be starting a YouTube channel hither in the next couple of months over tech products under $100.
Y'all don't come across the teensiest credibility trouble in not walking the walk ?
Burning down the studio probably isn't in the program either.
-- hide signature --
Ron.
Volunteer, what could possibly become wrong ?
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H2 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 Sony SLT-A57 NEX5R A3000 +26 more than
OP HParker • New Member • Posts: vii
Re: Of course information technology is proficient plenty
Thanks for the advice guys but I think I'm going to man up and buy a Canon T6i!
d750guy • Senior Member • Posts: 1,001
Re: Milky way s8 vs a DSLR camera
1
HParker wrote:
Hi everyone! I am going to be starting a YouTube channel hither in the next couple of months over tech products under $100. I am about to purchase a milky way s8 because I take to have Samsung's newest phone haha. Anyway would that be a good enough camera for my videos? The specs on it are pretty damn good for it being on a telephone. Or, should I just homo up and get a DSLR camera like the Nikon 3300. I desire my videos to await as good as possible. Thanks everyone.
Why don't y'all search Youtube and run into what vloggers say is the best photographic camera for video making. A lot of them want key video features like selfie screen, decent onboard mic, quite auto focus. etc I see a lot of youtubers employ the catechism m5 for those reasons.
Don't worry nearly video. Worry about audio.
Nowadays, even the almost basic Youtubers have expert video.
Only they all don't accept adequate audio.
I'd spend your fourth dimension researching how vloggers generate their audio... and perchance find the cheapest, best blindside for the buck fashion to do it and make it an early episode.
Nikon Coolpix 950 Nikon Z7 Nikon Z6 Nikon Z50
OP HParker • New Member • Posts: vii
Re: Where are you going to become an $8 for under $100 ?
1
Ron Poelman wrote:
HParker wrote:
Hi anybody! I am going to exist starting a YouTube channel here in the next couple of months over tech products under $100.
Yous don't encounter the teensiest credibility trouble in non walking the walk ?
Called-for down the studio probably isn't in the plan either.
I'm distressing I dont understand what you're trying to say.
Ido Scharf • Veteran Member • Posts: five,076
Re: Of course it is good enough
Would exist a lot improve to go for something like a Panasonic G7 (used?) for video.
Olympus 40-150mm F2.8 Pro Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Olympus 12-40mm F2.viii Pro Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 25mm F1.eight Panasonic 8-18mm F2.viii-4
Re: Of course information technology is adept enough
Ido S wrote:
Would be a lot ameliorate to become for something like a Panasonic G7 (used?) for video.
I agree ... the G7 would be much meliorate than the Canon, (or Nikon or any dSLR), since MirrorLess are much better for video.
Just you before mentioned the FZ-300/330. That would also be a neat choice if you similar its 600mm-EFL. And the FZ-100 has a larger sensor if 400mm-EFL is sufficient, (and it should be).
The S8 will-work but I would not recommend it.
Ido Scharf • Veteran Member • Posts: 5,076
Re: Of grade it is good enough
ane
OP: If you're going to buy the phone anyway, maybe it's best to only try shooting videos with the telephone first? And so y'all could see if you need something else.
Olympus 40-150mm F2.8 Pro Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Olympus 12-40mm F2.eight Pro Olympus Grand.Zuiko Digital 25mm F1.8 Panasonic 8-18mm F2.8-4
Kung Fu • Veteran Member • Posts: 3,990
Re: Milky way s8 vs a DSLR camera
HParker wrote:
How-do-you-do everyone! I am going to exist starting a YouTube channel here in the next couple of months over tech products under $100.
Excellent idea. $100 is my max budget for just nearly everything.
I am virtually to buy a galaxy s8 because I have to have Samsung's newest phone haha. Anyway would that exist a good plenty camera for my videos? The specs on it are pretty damn good for it beingness on a phone. Or, should I just homo up and get a DSLR camera like the Nikon 3300. I want my videos to look equally good as possible. Thanks everyone.
Doesn't Ted Forbes (The Art of Photography) use an RX100 for his videos? Information technology'south a very make clean look, I really savor his channel.
Whatever you get, the screen needs to flip effectually fully into selfie mode.
Re: Milky way s8 vs a DSLR camera
DSLRs use a divide off sensor autofocus organization (phase detection) when taking stills. Cell telephone use an on sensor focusing arrangement (contrast detection) for stills and video. Mirrorless cameras use on sensor focusing and have both stage and contrast detection on sensor. All focusing must be done on sensor for video considering the mirror is held out of the way exposing the sensor for video and live view.
If you do video and want autofocus and so you don't desire a DSLR. In that location are a few high end DSLRs now with Phase Detection on sensor but those cameras are $1500+.
If video is important then look at mirrorless cameras like the Sony a5100 (selfie flip screen), a6000, a6300 (4K and S-Log), a6500 (in body stabilization), Panasonic GH7 or fifty-fifty full frame cameras like the A7 series from Sony.
If y'all're into engineering and the future mirrorless is what you want anyways.
Kung Fu • Veteran Member • Posts: 3,990
Re: Galaxy s8 vs a DSLR photographic camera
viperkeeper wrote:
DSLRs apply a carve up off sensor autofocus organisation (phase detection) when taking stills. Cell telephone apply an on sensor focusing system (contrast detection) for stills and video. Mirrorless cameras use on sensor focusing and take both phase and dissimilarity detection on sensor. All focusing must be done on sensor for video because the mirror is held out of the way exposing the sensor for video and alive view.
Thanks for the lesson, but I already knew all that. Why tell me?
If yous do video and want autofocus then y'all don't desire a DSLR. There are a few high end DSLRs now with Phase Detection on sensor but those cameras are $1500+.
No, the Canon 80D is $1099. Although you can get to $1500 easily depending on which lenses you choose.
If video is of import and so await at mirrorless cameras like the Sony a5100 (selfie flip screen), a6000, a6300 (4K and South-Log), a6500 (in body stabilization), Panasonic GH7 or even full frame cameras like the A7 serial from Sony.
If you lot're into engineering and the future mirrorless is what you want anyways.
You haven't actually made a case here for ILC, over say a compact p&s with video capability.
Camley • Senior Member • Posts: ane,827
Re: Galaxy s8 vs a DSLR camera
1
HParker wrote:
Hi everyone! I am going to be starting a YouTube aqueduct here in the next couple of months over tech products under $100. I am almost to purchase a galaxy s8 considering I have to have Samsung'south newest telephone haha. Anyway would that exist a expert enough camera for my videos? The specs on information technology are pretty damn good for information technology being on a telephone. Or, should I simply human up and go a DSLR camera like the Nikon 3300. I want my videos to look equally good as possible. Thanks anybody.
Get a dedicated video photographic camera if you only programme to make videos.
Re: Galaxy s8 vs a DSLR photographic camera
Kung Fu wrote:
viperkeeper wrote:
DSLRs use a carve up off sensor autofocus organisation (phase detection) when taking stills. Cell phone employ an on sensor focusing organisation (contrast detection) for stills and video. Mirrorless cameras use on sensor focusing and have both phase and contrast detection on sensor. All focusing must be done on sensor for video because the mirror is held out of the fashion exposing the sensor for video and live view.
Cheers for the lesson, just I already knew all that. Why tell me?
Sorry I wasn't replying to you. I'm on a telephone I don't remember it shows who you respond too.
If y'all practise video and desire autofocus then y'all don't want a DSLR. There are a few loftier cease DSLRs now with Phase Detection on sensor just those cameras are $1500+.
No, the Canon 80D is $1099. Although you can get to $1500 easily depending on which lenses you choose.
I causeless he'd want a lens. Instead of putting a price on information technology I should have said he'll have to spend 2-3X the corporeality for a DSLR with expert video capabilities than he would a mirrorless camera.
If video is of import then look at mirrorless cameras like the Sony a5100 (selfie flip screen), a6000, a6300 (4K and S-Log), a6500 (in body stabilization), Panasonic GH7 or fifty-fifty full frame cameras like the A7 series from Sony.
If yous're into engineering science and the future mirrorless is what you lot desire anyways.
Yous oasis't really fabricated a case hither for ILC, over say a compact p&southward with video adequacy.
No y'all're right a P&South is a great option. But probably not better than his cell unless it'due south a i" sensor, that's going to in the price range of an ILC.
Keyboard shortcuts:
F Forum Thou My threads
Latest sample galleries
Latest in-depth reviews
Sony has just released a trio of impressively small-scale, lite, ultrawide lenses for APS-C. These lenses are designed for vloggers, and so Chris decided to picture show himself and find out how they perform.
Holy moly, this thing is tiny! We take the adorable Sigma sixteen-28mm F2.viii DG DN Contemporary effectually Calgary to come across how it performs.
The Fujifilm X-H2S is the company's latest APS-C flagship, using a 26MP Stacked CMOS sensor to deliver the fastest shooting, best autofocus and most extensive video specs of whatever Ten-series photographic camera notwithstanding. Here's what's new and what nosotros think so far...
We've been able to spend some quality time with Fujifilm'southward APS-C flagship, and we have enough of opinions!
How do yous make weird lens even weirder? Put a periscope on it! We check out the new Laowa Periprobe 24mm F14 2X and explore some of the creative things yous can do with such a bizarre lens.
Latest ownership guides
What'southward the all-time photographic camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather condition-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-upward several nifty cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.
If y'all're looking for the perfect drone for yourself, or to souvenir someone special, we've gone through all of the options and selected our favorites.
What's the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level prototype quality. In this buying guide we've rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Nearly modernistic cameras will shoot video to one caste or another, but these are the ones we'd wait at if you programme to shoot some video alongside your photos. We've chosen cameras that can take peachy photos and make it easy to become neat looking video, rather than existence the ones you'd cull as a committed videographer.
Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than simply a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've called a choice of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.
Source: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4138326
Posted by: gerstnercappraid.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Digital Camera Or Galaxy S8 Camera Trip Pictures?"
Post a Comment